Congress, according to recently released report."Billions of dollars in allowances are at stake under the proposals to cap and reduce global warming pollution," Dan Lashof, the science director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, which released the report, said in a statement.
Congress is mulling several bills that aim to regulate emissions of gases that scientists blame for global warming.
Power utilities that burn large amounts of carbon dioxide-emitting coal and natural gas have lobbied Congress to ensure that they would receive allocations of carbon credits under such regulation to help them deal with the compliance costs.
The report, on the other hand, supported auctioning such credits to prevent their overallocation to power generators.
It said an overly generous allocation of credits to power companies in the early days of the European Union's carbon market, the Emissions Trading Scheme, knocked down carbon prices, led to excessive company profits and created few incentives for funding energy efficiency programs that would have cut emissions.
The report, also released by Ceres, a Boston-based coalition of environmentalists and investors, assumed carbon allowance prices to be around $10 a ton.
It estimated that under the Climate Security Act sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut Democrat turned independent, and John Warner, a Virginia Republican, the 100 largest electric power generators would receive nearly $10.4 billion in annual free carbon credits by 2012.
Under the Carbon Economy Act, sponsored by Sens. Jeff Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat, and Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, the 100 largest power producers would receive nearly $18.3 billion annually, with $6.2 billion going to the country's 10 largest investor-owned utilities.