CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 6 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
CPUC penalties against Edison detail fines for unreported ex parte communications, Rule 1.1 and Rule 8.4 ethics violations tied to the San Onofre shutdown, undermining transparency, compliance, and public confidence in regulation.
What's Behind the News
They are fines for unreported ex parte contacts and ethics breaches tied to San Onofre, totaling $16.74M.
- Eight unreported ex parte communications from Mar 2013 to Jun 2014.
- Two Rule 1.1 ethics violations for misleading the CPUC.
- Rule 8.4 breaches for failing to report ex parte contacts.
The California Public Utilities Commission CPUC recently penalized Southern California Edison $16.7 million for failure to timely report ex parte communications and for misleading the CPUC, in violation of CPUC rules.
The CPUC, which issued the PG&E pipeline penalty previously, determined that Edison engaged in eight unreported ex parte communications between March 26, 2013 and June 17, 2014 related to the shutdown of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, in violation of Rule 8.4 of the CPUC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure stemming from failure to report, before or after, ex parte communications that occurred between an Edison executives and a Commissioner. In addition, the CPUC determined that Edison twice violated Rule 1.1, the CPUC’s ethics rule, as a result of the acts and omissions of Edison and its employees, which misled the CPUC, showed disrespect for the CPUC’s Rules, and undermined public confidence in the CPUC, even as outcomes like the Con Edison rebate seek to rebuild trust among ratepayers.
Of the total penalty:
- $16,520,000 is based on finding that a continuing Rule 1.1 violation was set in motion by Edison’s failure to accurately and timely report ex parte communications that occurred in Warsaw, Poland, and the contemporaneous Edison Mission inquiry at FERC provided wider context for regulators
- $190,000 is for Edison’s violations of Rule 8.4 related to unreported ex parte communications, similar to California efficiency penalties imposed on other utilities,
- $30,000 is for a Rule 1.1 violation related to a false statement about ex parte communications, a problem that also drew a Con Edison penalty in another case,
Related News
Related News
Nova Scotia regulator approves 14% electricity rate hike, defying premier
Electricity Prices in France Turn Negative
DOE Announces $28M Award for Wind Energy
Wind and Solar Double Global Share of Electricity in Five Years
Key Ontario power system staff may end up locked down at work sites due to COVID-19, operator says
Nigeria's Electricity Crisis
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue