Commission tightens utility's billing rules


CSA Z463 Electrical Maintenance -

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today
The California Public Utilities Commission unanimously passed a resolution that stiffens the rules regarding PG&E's controversial practice of issuing delayed or estimated bills in lieu of checking meters on a monthly basis.

Some customers and consumer advocates say the San Francisco- based energy utility's policy has resulted in steep bills that include months worth of charges and, when customers are unable to pay, unfair power shut-offs.

Under the new resolution, PG&E can only collect fees for underestimated or delayed bills going back three months, mandating a policy the company put in place on Oct. 13 following a letter directing it to do so from PUC Director Stephen Larson.

PG&E spokeswoman Christy Dennis said the company was planning to make such a change preceding the letter.

Separately, the company can now only estimate bills for reasons beyond its control, such as locked entries or barking dogs, and must in turn tell customers why their bill was estimated.

The PUC withheld a final decision on whether it will conduct a formal investigation into PG&E's past billing, which could eventually entail rewriting the tariff that governs such practices and refunding customers.

San Francisco-based consumer advocacy organization the Utility Reform Network has lobbied the PUC to commit to such an investigation.

Noting it's long been the rule that PG&E can't bill beyond three months for bill errors -- PG&E had said an unsent bill isn't the same as an error -- TURN spokeswoman Mindy Spatt said that many customers were forced to grapple with unduly large bills.

"It's a good start," Spatt said of the resolution. "But we are extremely concerned about how long this practice has been going on for and how consumers were harmed by it."

Dennis said PG&E had "no problem" with a possible investigation.

"We've been working with (the PUC) for the past six months, so it just gives us another opportunity to formally explain our billing practice and explore the benefits of any modification," Dennis said.

Related News

Europe's largest shore power plant opens

AIDAsol shore power Rostock-Warnemfcnde delivers cold ironing for cruise ships, up to 20 MVA at…
View more

Expanding EV Charging Infrastructure in Calgary's Apartments and Condos

Calgary EV Charging for Apartments and Condos streamlines permitting for multi-unit dwellings, guiding condo boards…
View more

B.C. ordered to pay $10M for denying Squamish power project

Greengen Misfeasance Ruling details a B.C. Supreme Court decision awarding $10.125 million over wrongfully denied…
View more

Will Israeli power supply competition bring cheaper electricity?

Israel Electricity Reform Competition opens the supply segment to private suppliers, challenges IEC price controls,…
View more

In Europe, A Push For Electricity To Solve The Climate Dilemma

EU Electrification Strategy 2050 outlines shifting transport, buildings, and industry to clean power, accelerating EV…
View more

Hydro-Québec will refund a total of $535 million to customers who were account holders in 2018 or 2019

Hydro-Québec Bill 34 Refund issues $535M customer credits tied to electricity rates, consumption-based rebates, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified